Better than Covidence

The Best Covidence Alternative for Systematic Reviews

Whether you're a PhD student or a med-comms agency, Covidence slows you down with manual random screening.
Lumina ranks papers by relevance, cutting screening time by 80%.

Start Your 14-Day Trial See the Difference
🚀

AI Priority Ranking

Covidence shows papers randomly.
Lumina brings relevant papers to the top, so you find 95% of inclusions by screening just 20% of the pile.

🧠

Concept Search

Covidence relies on exact keywords.
Lumina understands concepts (e.g., "heart attack" matches "myocardial infarction") using vector embeddings.

🤖

Instant Explanations

Covidence gives you just an abstract.
Lumina's Pixel-Bot explains why a paper meets your criteria and highlights key findings instantly.

Compare Features

Feature
Covidence
Lumina
Screening Order
Random / Oldest First
✨ AI Prioritized
Search Technology
Keywords (Boolean)
🧠 Semantic + Keywords
AI Explanations
❌
✅
Active Learning
❌
✅
Database Integration
Manual Export/Import
Live Search (PubMed, etc.)
Literature Alerts
❌
✅
PRISMA Flow Generator
Manual Tracking
Automated & Free
Stopping Strategies
❌
AI Confidence & Yield
Blinding & Conflicts
Basic / Premium Only
Advanced Dual Review
✉️

Not ready to import your project yet?

Join 500+ researchers and agencies getting our weekly guide on using AI to speed up methodology.

No spam, just resources to speed up your research.

Migrating from Covidence?

It's easy. Export your papers as an RIS file from Covidence and drag-and-drop them into Lumina. Keep all your existing data and start using AI immediately.

Import from Covidence

Common Questions

Is Lumina better than Covidence?

For most researchers, yes. Lumina uses modern LLMs and active learning to sort papers, whereas Covidence typically relies on basic keyword matching or random ordering.

Can I import my Covidence project?

Yes! Just export your references as an RIS file from Covidence and upload them to Lumina.